Monday, July 25, 2011

Getting to know Team 10

Team 10 are a diverse group of people from different backgrounds ranging from Graphical Design to Landscape Architecture to Fine Art to Urban Planning. The group is an international collaboration with members from Greece, America and Australia; 5 are from Brisbane, 1 is from Melbourne, 1 is from Sydney, 2 are from Greece and 1 from America. The 5 Brisbane participants knew each other before and the 2 Greek members are a father and son duo; the other participants are strangers.

Once the team was announced by Urban Realities the group began conversing through emails. It was evident that in order to work well as a team, they should get to know each other to find out what interests and skills they shared or what unique skills they could utilise for the challenge.

The group has made it a priority to work together from day 1 to get used to each members' collaboration styles.

8 members of the group decided to meet up on the Sunday before the challenge started, over a beer, to get to know each other socially. The conversation did however wander and the group began discussing the Docklands area and what some members already knew about the space. Several members, most former residents of Melbourne, were the most knowledgeable about the Docklands.

Throughout the discussion it became evident that the Docklands' urban spaces were at the beginning of an ongoing journey. The group all agreed that a public space is never "finished"; it will continue to ebb and flow and change and evolve.

This view was then reinforced in the Site Briefing by Bridget Liondias, Amanda Roberts and Margie MacKoy from VicUrban and City of Melbourne. These experts introduced us to the background of the development, the history of the site, facts and figures, the future directions of the site and answered every question we could throw at them! They told us that the development is only 50% complete. The parts that have been constructed were funded by large companies who were needed to initially fund the project. These companies have developed large "campus style" buildings as their headquarters, which have meant large expanses of spaces in between each building, each featuring its own unique urban designs. These have resulted in a disconnected urban environment. In the future smaller businesses will be encouraged to develop in the spaces between, diversifying the scale of the area and tying the precincts together.

It was clear in the presentation that the present day doc
klands is stage 1 of a long term plan and that over 25 years the aim is to:
- encourage the fine grain,
- connect to the water,
- focus on mobility,
- protect heritage,
- create urban delights,
- consider climatic constraints,
- diversify character,
- support public life,
- improve the quality of the streets, and
- green the area and introduce biodiversity.

Team X is very interested in the fact that the urban spaces of the Docklands are being recognised as being part of a evolving, changing, moving process and such it is an appropriate site for a 3 day challenge, for the State of Design Festival, which has the motto Design that Moves. We look forward to exploring this further...

The team took the time to wander around the Docklands this afternoon, and were fortunate enough to capture this lovely sunset.


See more of our images from today, in our online gallery.

FOLLOW TEAM X LIVE on twitter and facebook.



Author, Amy Saunders on behalf of Team X who are Leigh Abernethy, Amy Saunders, Brooke Murphy, Luke Self, Damien Carroll, Myles Broad, Ilian Seferlis-Frantziz, Andreas Seferlis, Nanette Milner and Emily Ogilvie.

Team 9 - Discussions on Docklands

Jimmy - Landscape Architecture Student, mid 20s, Parkville VIC

T9: What do you think of docklands?

Jimmy: 虽然docklands附近的景观比较平淡, 但是沿岸的步行道行走起来还是比较舒适的。Even though the landscape is a bit boring around docklands, it is quite comfortable walking along the piers, 行道比较宽阔,沿路绿化比较充足,遮荫比较好。It has wide footpaths with sufficient greenery along the sides that provides nice shading

T9: Do you have any suggestions to improve docklands?

Jimmy: 驳岸太高了,亲水性不好,建议可以建和水面持平的平台。停船的突堤太密集了,建议减少停船位,

提供更多的开放水面。Provide larger water body by having less jetties for boats, and decking that is more levelled with the water surface which would bring people close to the water


Will – Golf Designer, 30s, Fairfield VIC

T9: What do you think of Docklands?

Will: Only been there once, I wasn’t able to appreciate the recent development as the weather was poor… Haven’t been back since as there is no real attraction to visit or maybe it isn’t publicised enough


Gemma – Landscape Architect, 20s, Ivanhoe VIC

T9: Do you go to docklands much?

Gemma: Little bit, everything you need is in the city already, there is not much reason to go.

T9: Yes, where is the incentive for people?

Gemma: Something unique, like the big ferris wheel, but it didn’t do a good job at attracting people.”

T9: So, would you live there?

Gemma: No, it’s like a ghost town.

T9: Come on, something positive?

Gemma: It is good that they are doing something about the area! More thoughts need to go into the development.


Akihito – Landscape Architect, 20s, VIC

Aki: 特に気に入っていると言うまちではない。I don’t have any special attachment to Docklands”, 政府からのファンド等小さな店を沢山入れるように勧める。Push small retail to open shops, for example. Government should fund small businesses as a start…


Ian - Contract administrator, 50s, Mount Dandenong, VIC

T9: Tell me your opinion on docklands?

Ian: I applauded the move, but the site lacks cohesion and balance of space.

T9: How can we improve it?

Ian: Start knocking down the buildings, haha... no I think the space between the building are to close together and too high. It needs to be more vibrant! It’s all about critical mass, you can go down there and shot a gun and not hit anybody

T9: Haha, it is quite empty when there is no activity at the stadium

Ian: Exactly, its like a cork in the middle, and you got to ask you self why you are going there? Given the arrangement of the site it would have always been a challenge to develop a strong cohesive feel across the whole of the site, this has been exacerbated by the use of different developers (and consequently planners and architects).

While some may feel the stadium is a focal point for the area however for me it acts as a plug which impacts on the physical and visual flow through the area.

I cannot comment on the residential area (although I do like a few of the buildings) as I have not been there for some considerable time however I am prepared to comment on the northern sector which contains the icehouse, Ferris wheel etcetera. Again this area lacks character. There is not a lot in the architecture to excite me, the access feels constricted and the buildings overpowering and the ground plane loses its way in the pedestrian carriage ways.

Finally I feel they face a disconnect with the city. Part of it is a result of the train lines and roadways that transect the area and the other is the pedestrian access from the city centre to the docklands area (tram access is OK if not well advertised). Finally you have to have a reason to go there and unless you live there I cannot see why you would leave the CBD to travel there and that is the crux of it in my mind. The area has got to offer some thing more or something different or most likely something of both. What has it got (actually or potentially) that the CBD and other areas do not??? How do you develop/bring that out (promoting it is for others)?


Victor - 23, Melbourne, VIC

T9: What do you think about Docklands?

Victor: The place is cold and windy. Buildings are too big, however, it has a really interesting plan, with the end of the Victoria harbor precinct physically connected by the column of the Bridge. That is a really interesting connection. First of all, I don’t go to clubs or shop or even watch AFL, so the main activities in Dockland do not attract people like me to visit.

T9: Why do you think docklands is the way it is?

Victor: The place is not rich in culture or activities. Since it is a new place, a unique or a very strong attractor is required to pull the people into the city. It's the star Architecture which will eventually follow by a series of developments like the Bilbao effects. However, Bilbao effect does not sustain the place for a long time. A rich and diverse city has to be nurtured. I guess the place was developed too fast, too focused on the plan. There needs to be a reflective process after a each phase of development.

T9: What kind of activities, in your opinion, would activate the use of public space in docklands?

Victor: I think more communal interaction is important. A sense of belonging for the people of Docklands who are going to be more passionate about development instead of a 'foreign' developers and external 'intelligence'. I think any new activities will be a plus point to Docklands. I'm not sure what activity will be effective to revitalise the place instantly, but i would say it has to be something that the city doesn't have or never have. I would suggest to look at docklands as the entire area...the Toll Road, Footscray Road, Wurundjeri Way, Lorimer Street. The point is to see the water as a future habitable space to generate new and funky activities.


Macus - 22, SCIARC, California

T9: What do you think about docklands?

Macus: Beautiful, and a bit classy. It has nice views, and large open spaces.

T9: Why do you think docklands is the way it is?

Macus: It has the river next to it. And a stadium as the main event stage.

T9: What kind of activities, in your opinion, would activate the use of public space in docklands?

Macus: Flying kites, nursery for plants, dating hotspots, live tv shows (like cooking)? Yoga classes?


Justin - 23, Deakin University, Box Hill, VIC

T9: What do you think about Docklands?

Justin: Expensive? Luxurious?

T9: So you don't like spending time there?

Justin: Well, I do but if you ask my opinion, I'd say those 2 adjectives.

T9: What kind of activities do you think will attract you to spend time there?

Justin: Not quite sure what we can do now in the winter though, windy and cold. Food will definitely bring me there, cultural related festivals, food stalls.


Sean – Student, Master of Architecture Melbourne University

T9: What do you think about Dockland as a place to stay?

Sean: As a university student, I feel that is not such a pleasant place to stay due to the lack of the amenities the city has mainly the entertainment outlets, cafes and bars.

T9: Any thoughts about the open and public spaces in Docklands?

Sean: Public open spaces in docklands are in abundance but I feel that they lack integration with the overall built form of docklands. Whenever I’m there over the weekends, most of the areas around docklands with the exception of the harbor town precinct feels dead making the open spaces feel desolate.

T9: How do you see Docklands in 5 years time?

Sean: Unless further improvements are done to make the streets and open spaces more lively, that is with more cafes, bars and entertainment, it will remain as it is.

T9: Name one aspects of Docklands you think needs improvement.

Sean: More diversed programs to encourage people to visit the area.


Serena - Accountant

T9: What do you think about Dockland as a place to stay?

Serena: Very expensive! The cost of accommodation and daily expenses are relatively high compared to surrounding suburbs. So not a lot people I guess could afford to stay there.

T9: Any thoughts about the open and public spaces in Docklands?

Serena: More open spaces compared to the CBD based on the area ration. But there aren’t any larger parks around, mostly small green open spaces scattered around. And to be honest, not really useful. There aren’t enough trees within those small ‘parks’. It doesn’t attract me as a place to hang around or jog.

T9: How do you see Docklands in 5 years time?

Serena: I guess when the residential and commercial projects complete within the next few years, maybe it will be more lively.

T9: Name one aspects of Docklands you think needs improvement.

Serena: More trams. It is quite hard to get around in Docklands, especially from one end to the other.


Praveen - Student, Business Economics and Finance

T9: What do you think about Dockland as a place to stay?

Praveen: Since it is located right next to the CBD, not as quiet as the suburbs and not as crowded as the CBD, I would love to stay there. Also, I study in RMIT city campus, so it takes around 10 minutes to travel between my apartment and university.

T9: Any thoughts about the open and public spaces in Docklands?

Praveen: I don’t really have much comment about that since I hardly use open and public spaces. One thing I notice is it gets really dark at night, there are lack of street lights.

T9: How do you see Docklands in 5 years time?

Praveen: When they are done with the constructions then I think the whole area would be livelier. But they definitely have to develop the Victoria Harbor area. Seems pretty dead when compared Harbor Town.

T9: Name one aspects of Docklands you think needs improvement.

Praveen: I think they should increase the frequency of trams travelling between the CBD and Docklands.

Day 1 Summary: Bitter Sweet

Urban realities launched today with a brief presentation at the stunning headquarters of VicUrban from a team of energetic, enthusiastic and engaged women from both the Melbourne City Council and Vic Urban. The presentation was a brief overview of the physical, social, economical and political history of the site from its early life as an aboriginal hunting ground, it's booming 50's, its bust 70's (and subsequent illegal rave life in the 80's) through to the most recent redevelopment and future ambitions.

The current ills of the site- it's lack of diversity in use, inconsistent urban materiality, impersonal scale and lack of public ownership- are due to the campus style subdivision and development of land that was necessary to ensure the investment injection. The next phase of development will focus on connecting the silos and in doing so ensuring that the wider community, that the development has the potential to attract, gets a say. This will be supported by the release of a Gehl architects public life report and recommendations later in the year and of course the short term stimulus of an event such as Urban Realities.

I think if there is anything that we have learnt from the VicUrban presentation it is the importance of collaboration in facilitating positive urban transformation. Collaboration enables the exchange and progression of ideas, enables an efficient use of resources, restricts personal agendas and ensures a more cohesive yet diverse outcome. The only way the site will be able to develop cohesively at all stages is through collaboration, including the development of ideas in Urban Realities.

Throughout the day we have all been exploring the site as individuals, in our teams and also just informally meeting and chatting with individuals from all teams. I hope that, even as the competition develops, we might be able to keep this exchange between the teams continuing for the benefit of whole precinct. I am not suggesting that we forego the competition but rather that we keep up an open exchange of ideas between the teams, and with the public, to ensure the diverse yet cohesive outcome that is needed to successfully realise the full potential of the site.

To kickstart this exchange I have included some images below taken this afternoon when myself and members from team 2 and 10 were exploring the site. During the VicUrban presentation it is noted that there is not an element of surprise at the site, but we were certainly surprised when the clouds parted revealing a setting sun and a stunning experience at the site. It would be great if our installations could in a way provide a new perspective of Docklands, one as surprising as this, which may be as simple as ensuring that people are at the site not just when they have to be there for work but also when it is at its best. Do yourself a favour and make sure you check out sunset at Docklands as it is far more stunning than my iPhone could ever capture!




Introducing Team 7!

Dsc01723
Hi world,

Team 7 blogger, Michelle, here.

Our team is off to a rocking start - we've had drinks at Rue Beb's, dinner at Ghin Khao, lunch at Don Tojo and our email thread is now 60+ emails long! Our team includes: Ammon Beyerle, Michelle Emma James, Tim Derham, Caitlyn Parry and Kamil Muhammad from here studio, architect Amiria Kiddle who just arrived from NZ yesterday, RMIT Landscape Architecture students Michael Ryan & Andrew Bellman, recent Deakin graduate Bryan Seng and landscape architect Tara Cull.

We've set-up our social media autoposts so that one little email will instantly update our posterous, the Urban Realities blog, twitter, and youtube. As we've done with many of our past projects, we plan to blog real-time throughout the design and build process!

Amiria and Bryan are down at the Docklands right now, so we look forward to their cartwheel photos later today! See you all at the Symposium tomorrow x

Team 4 Warming up

Before the whole team met in person for the first time in Melbourne, we circulated responses to 3 questions:
1. One thing the project does
2. One urban condition that the project addresses
3. One song that describes (in part) our civic intention

Tom:
It stakes a claim.
The commercialisation of public space (i.e. there is something about our project that cannot be sold (or bought).
In the Court of the Crimson King; King Crimson

Dario:
The project takes/shifts focus from the mid level to the upper, lower and
 other reaches of environment.


Addressing the paradoxical conflict of "not enough people/still that is
 too many people" in the urban centre; that "wolves will tear us
 apart...again."
"new york I love you (but you're bringing me down)" by lcd sound system...
Nice universal post-naughties angst with love about a city that's going 
awry.

Lian:
The project simply "delights".

Addresses the urban condition of "dead space".
Song: Take Me To Broadway by Gonzales (
check the kooky video
 http://youtu.be/a7pESuX9E24)

Chris:
The project is a drawcard. It serves the student/hipster/trendies by providing a limited and highly desired resource at a cheaper price / be the only place in the city where you can get them. I'm thinking theatre tickets.

It addresses the fact that any installation needs an awesome, receptive audience. Bring the kids in, and they will play.


The song. Well, 'Cabaret' from the movie of the same name comes to mind.

Maz:
The project serves [as] a pyschogeographic "drift" into an unplanned journey/experience where the architecture provides a bridge to authenticity lacking in.
An urban condition devoid of humanity and human scale.
The Specials, Ghost Town... for obvious reasons.

Sergei:
The project is plural - it can be approached from different ways, senses, speeds and emotions.
The project addresses the issue of scale within a developing urban park - there is something 'hollow' about Docklands and scale is a key issue.
The song is Four Ton Mantis - Amon Tobin. Feels like walking through docklands but then something happens and we are moved.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SH33gWfD4Xw&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SH33gWfD4Xw&feature=related

Michael
The project provokes.
The project addresses the lack of complexity of, and sophistication within, the urban realm of Docklands.
The song is Battles' "Tonto", which is wordless, rhythmically complex, musically incredible, and has a cracker video with light installation by light artists UVA from the UK.

TEAM FIVE IS ALIVE!